categories:

- Albania
- all categories
- Arrival Home
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Book Publication
- Book Reviews
- BTC Pipeline
- Canary Islands
- China
- China (Anhui)
- China (Gansu)
- China (Henan)
- China (Jiangsu)
- China (Ningxia)
- China (Qinghai)
- China (Shaanxi)
- China (Zhejiang)
- Croatia
- Cycle Paths
- England
- equipment
- Flashbacks
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- highlights
- Hokkaido (Japan)
- Hong Kong
- Italy
- Japan
- Kazakhstan
- Korea
- Kyrgyzstan
- Macedonia
- Mexico
- Montenegro
- New Zealand
- planning/prep
- Post-2008
- Random
- recumbent bike
- Sapporo
- School Visits
- Shiretoko Tour (2012)
- Slovenia
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Technology
- The Atlantic
- The Caribbean
- The Netherlands (Holland)
- Trip Ideas
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- USA (Alabama)
- USA (Arizona)
- USA (California)
- USA (FLorida)
- USA (LOUISIANA)
- USA (Mississippi)
- USA (New Mexico)
- USA (Texas)
- Uzbekistan
- vids
- Village Camps
- war on weight
- website

archivies

- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006

September 22nd, 2006 | categorizilation: all categories,Kyrgyzstan

**Distance / 距離：** 34.31km

**Time / 時間：** 3h 45m

**Average speed / 平均速度：** 9.1km/h

**Distance to date / 今日までの積算距離：** 2692.1km

**English Summary:** Stopped early at a good campsite at the foot of the zig zags. *But more importantly, time for you mathematicians to put your thinking caps on. The question of the day is, can you work out the gradient of a road using the variables ‘velocity’ and ‘altitude gain’. Example: I am cycling at a speed of 5km/h, and I am gaining altitude at a speed of 8 metres per minute. What is the gradient of the road I am on? I thought it had something to do with the amount of fies buzzing around my head divided by pie….mmmmm, pie…*

登る、登る！峠まであと700mのところにテントを午後4時に張りました。まだまだ乗る時間がありましたが、登る途中にテントの場所があるかどうかわかりませんでした。となりの農民によると狼がたまにいるから食べられるかもしれませんよ！

Pingback by 1 4 d e g r e e s » Day 64 - In Osh — September 25, 2006 @ 10:09 pm | post a comment

[...] If you need something to mull over while I hoof it over ‘the roof of the world’, then take a look at this post and let me know if you know the answer. [...]

Comment by Mike C — September 26, 2006 @ 2:45 pm | post a comment

OK Rob,

Here's the answer to your gradient question…

Your actual speed was 5km/hr = 5/60×1000 = 83m/min (make this the hypotenuse of the triangle).

The vertical side of the triangle is your rate of vertical ascent: 8m/min.

Using pythagorus, the bottom side of the triangle is:

x = sqrt(83^2-8^2) = 82.6m/min

Therefore, the gradient you were climbing is:

82.6 : 8

or

10.33 : 1

The angle of ascent was:

a = inverse-sin(8/83)

= 5.53 degrees.

Keep Him at the centre.

Mike

Comment by carl w. — September 26, 2006 @ 3:47 pm | post a comment

try the boiling water thing the higher up you are the lower the boiling of water, so you need the following.

1x sat phone

2x stoves

2x kettles

2x thermomonometers

2x equal amounts of water from a constant source

2x fuel

when you've got all that sorted call me and I'll go to the seaside and do the experiment at the same time we can then compare notes and findings

also the world is not exactly square so I'm only guessing here but matey maths is wrong… right in principle but wrong in fact.

Comment by Rob Thomson — September 26, 2006 @ 9:46 pm | post a comment

Mike, so what's that in percent? They have signs here that say 12% gradient for all the steep hills, but some feel steeper than others…

Comment by Rob Thomson — September 26, 2006 @ 9:47 pm | post a comment

Carl, the world isn't square?! No wonder it was taking me so long to find an edge.

Comment by Mike C — September 26, 2006 @ 11:46 pm | post a comment

To find the gradient as a percentage you need to divide the vertical velocity by the horizontal velocity and then multiply by 100.

So for above:

8/82.6×100 = 9.69%

To get a more accurate result for the percentage gradient:

1) Zero your speedo at the bottom of the hill. Take note of the altitude at the bottom of the hill. Start your stop watch.

2) Bike up to the top of the hill.

3) At the top, stop your stop watch, take note of your average speed and the altitude you have climbed.

time = t (s)

average velocity = v (km/hr)

altitude climbed = a (m)

Plug the numbers into the following formula which I just derived:

———————–

%gradient = 360xa/(txv)

———————–

(This is the simplified approximate version – which I recommend using, unless you like maths).

Alternatively use this nutty formula:

%gradient = (360xa/t)/sqrt(v^2-(3.6xa/t)^2)

(This is the more precise version)

However note: this is an average gradient – if you want to know the gradient of the steepest part, you'll need to record "t", "v" & "a" over the steepest part.

This should give you something to think about on those crazy hills of yours!

Mike

Comment by Andrew — September 27, 2006 @ 5:06 am | post a comment

Professor Mike is a bit of a legend huh? But if you don't have a scientific calculator on you, you can plug some figures into here to make conversions

http://www.cactus2000.de/uk/unit/massgrd.shtml

Unless you do the pythagoras equation, you will need to estimate your horizontal distance, but it shouldn't be too much less than the reading on your speedo.

Comment by carl w. — September 28, 2006 @ 9:24 am | post a comment

blah balh blah still think it better with kettles of boiling water all this cheating with a watch what can tell you how high your getting whats that all about next you'll be telling you got a GPS?

whatever happend to lady luck and using the stars?

Comment by Pete Kosel — October 1, 2006 @ 3:31 pm | post a comment

I get 9.64% grade.

8m/min / (5kph/60*1000)= 8/83.33= 0.0960m/m

asin(0.0960)=5.5089 degree slope

tan(5.5089 deg) = .0964 m-vertical/m-horizontal

100%*.0964 = 9.64% grade

Of course 0.0964 is almost the same as 0.0960; the trigonometry is just for show because the horizontal distance is almost exactly the same as the distance the bike rolls for small angles like the grade of most roads.

Copyright © 2005 Robert Thomson